Caution:
Many of the ongoing stimulus projects will fall short of expectations unless tracked and modified during the funding process. As a supporter of energy efficiency projects, I have to argue in favor of benchmarking. Many lighting industry programs, that are currently touting savings, will promote and implement programs that could leave projects falling far short of expectations should they be left unevaluated along the way. Unessential monies will be spent and most will fail to return stimulus money through applications for utility rebates and tax incentive programs. My biggest concern is the installation of renewable energy products that are either ineffective or substandard. Energy demands must be marked and tracked to quantify reductions and to determine viability of renewable sources prior to project fund commitments. Viability must be a qualifying factor. Most government officials, public servants and employees are woefully untrained in energy efficiency, efficacy and renewable sources to be judge, jury and bailiff on projects brought before the funding court. I argue on behalf of evaluating independent consultants on prior project performance analysis and depth of experience before implementation.
No comments:
Post a Comment